r32 times??

FPVWEPN · 11-05-2006, 03:10 AM

Does anybody know the factory quarter mile times for a r32 gts-t skyline manual in stock form??? thanks

Steffo · 11-05-2006, 06:07 AM

You're looking at anything from 15 flat to about 14.7. That's assuming the driver, conditions and tyres are all good.

Walkinshaw · 11-05-2006, 09:02 AM

15.0-14.8. In stock/mild work they are good fun against

XRated · 11-05-2006, 11:10 AM

Does it take much to get them into the 13s?

Walkinshaw · 11-05-2006, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XRated

Does it take much to get them into the 13s?

Exhaust, FMIC and a tweek to 12lb should see it in the 13's. They only weigh in at about 1230kg iirc.

**ebxr8240** · 11-05-2006, 12:11 PM

Aftermarket dump pipe they can run 14.00...

FPVWEPN · 11-05-2006, 01:53 PM

this is for the rb20

FPVWEPN · 11-05-2006, 01:53 PM

this is for the rb20 yhe or the rb25??

ON_DUBS · 11-05-2006, 02:01 PM

nismo stickers add about 5rkw each so it also depends on how many of those have been added to the vehicle

kinksta · 11-05-2006, 03:10 PM

bigger spoiler will add 3.8rkw, some neons beleive it or not add 0.4rkw, but the most obvious a big, powerful sub in the truck will add 6rkw. its got something to do with the sound waves. who said you have to modify the engine....

Walkinshaw · 11-05-2006, 03:13 PM

RB20 motor isnt anything special. Ive driven a few R32's and well not very "tractable" Any engine that needs more than 2500 under its belt to get moving is a bit lacking.

Rb25 is a whole diffrent kettle of fish.

nugget378 · 11-05-2006, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aussiefalcon

nismo stickers add about 5rkw each so it also depends on how many of those have been added to the vehicle

I'd hate to go up against one with the whole shopping list down the doors then if thats the case.

nb_351 · 11-05-2006, 10:57 PM

didnt think the r32 came out rb25? im pretty sure they didnt...
the 2l isnt a bad motor, but the 2.6 is in a different league... i think its the best motor in the last 20 years... will probably get my a** eaten out for it, but i do think so... either that or the 4g63 from the evos... has a lot of wins and development behind it... cant argue with world championships, and world drag records... i know people will have someting to say about that, but bring it on i say... hang on...

Steffo · 12-05-2006, 02:26 AM

To get an R32 GTSt (160kW RB20DET stock) you need exhaust, intake, FMIC, and a boost-tap... 12 or 14 psi (I forget what the max the ECU allows is). That's an easy 13. After that things start to cost more (ie: alot), with the need for ECU tuning, upgraded turbocharger etc etc etc.

Homer · 12-05-2006, 02:36 AM

Yeah the RB20 shouldn't need to much to get into the 13's (as Steffo says) but after that would need a bit more work with a different turbo.

They are a good revy motor though, and probably a better motor then the RB25 if you want high RPM action :yeees:

Think the R32 came out with a RB25DE at the end of the series if my memory is correct.

Walkinshaw · 12-05-2006, 11:00 AM

Best mod for an R32 with an RB20. Ditch it for an RB25

Steffo · 13-05-2006, 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkinshaw

Best mod for an R32 with an RB20. Ditch it for an RB25

Which will acheive... absolutley nothing. RB20DET and RB25DET are almost identical. Exactly the same head, turbocharger, ECU etc. The only different is the crank, for an extra 500cc of capacity - which in most normal street applications, especially for a 13 sec car, is totally useless.

Poetic Justice · 13-05-2006, 10:15 AM

Actually, from my experiences putting an RB25 in an R32 is a whole different game to the factory RB20. It's not a useless application at all.

CJR09 · 13-05-2006, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steffo

To get an R32 GTSt (160kW RB20DET stock) you need exhaust, intake, FMIC, and a boost-tap... 12 or 14 psi (I forget what the max the ECU allows is). That's an easy 13. After that things start to cost more (ie: alot), with the need for ECU tuning, upgraded turbocharger etc etc etc.

Dead right - my brother had his doing 13.2 1/4's with the above mods, from mem the boost was at 12psi, from mem the max/safe limit is 15psi??

bloody cheap quick cars - interesting though his was a converted manual from auto, initially ran the auto ecu with the manual went bloody hard - then changed to the manual ecu and lost a 0.5 sec - ended up going back to the auto ecu - something to do with the diff fuel mapping??

as mentioned they dont have much below 2500rpm but that is easily compensated with your driving technique

Kenster · 13-05-2006, 03:13 PM

could i say dude you are asking the wrong forum for inform should go to skyline Australia they would help you in helping you boost up your 32 gtst

Barry_v · 13-05-2006, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steffo

Which will acheive... absolutley nothing. RB20DET and RB25DET are almost identical. Exactly the same head, turbocharger, ECU etc. The only different is the crank, for an extra 500cc of capacity - which in most normal street applications, especially for a 13 sec car, is totally useless.

so a 25% increase in capacity through stroking is a waste of time?

a 302 to 351 is only like a 16% increase, I suppose its a waste of time doing that to a clevo too.

more power at lower rpm with faster spooling isnt your thing steff?

Steffo · 13-05-2006, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry_v

so a 25% increase in capacity through stroking is a waste of time?

a 302 to 351 is only like a 16% increase, I suppose its a waste of time doing that to a clevo too.

more power at lower rpm with faster spooling isnt your thing steff?

To get a 13 with an RB20 doesn't require extra capacity. There would be little to no difference in performance. Going higher, capacity is great sure, but as I said, for most normal street applications (ie: making the GTSt a 13 sec car), there's no point. Its a needlessly expensive exercise.

Walkinshaw · 13-05-2006, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steffo

To get a 13 with an RB20 doesn't require extra capacity. There would be little to no difference in performance. Going higher, capacity is great sure, but as I said, for most normal street applications (ie: making the GTSt a 13 sec car), there's no point. Its a needlessly expensive exercise.

Ask any mechanical engineer.

Q: What is the best way to screw more power from an internal combustion engine?

A: Increase its capacity.

Lukaz · 14-05-2006, 02:39 PM

I got a r32, they run around 14.8 in a manual from factory, Since I've had mine Ive done full 3inch exhaust with CES dumppipe and highflow cat, Hybrid intercooler, 255ltr/per hour fuel pump, 440cc injectors, Wolf3d ecu, and up'ed the boost to 14psi. On the mechanic's dyno it made 160rwkw, altho on the street it seem's to be alot quicker, I've taken farely easy win's over a few evo 3's, couple of wrx's, an evo6 (very proud of that one hehe) basicly any 5ltr, gen3's, other imports (180's, 200sx's etc), vl turbo's... the list goes on.

If I couldn't break into the 13's I'd be surprised. Altho I've seen afew s14 200sx's with similar power run mid to low 13's, so hopefully when I finally get it to the track I won't be disapointed.

Edit:
Also, the rb20's hate bigger turbo's, they can get very laggy, my turbo is still stock, once it blow's I will be rebuilding it and highflowing it, should be good for around 500hp, then I'll up the boost abit more and hopefully see over 200rwkw.

Steffo · 14-05-2006, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkinshaw

Ask any mechanical engineer.

Q: What is the best way to screw more power from an internal combustion engine?

A: Increase its capacity.

*sigh*

Am I ever debating that? What I'm saying is to get an RB20 R32 to run a 13 does not require capacity increase. It is an unecessary waste of money. However, if you're chasing bigger numbers, then yes, it is a good thing.

Walkinshaw · 14-05-2006, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steffo

*sigh*

Am I ever debating that? What I'm saying is to get an RB20 R32 to run a 13 does not require capacity increase. It is an unecessary waste of money. However, if you're chasing bigger numbers, then yes, it is a good thing.

if youre after "streetability" increasing the capacity is FAR better than any other mod.

jabba · 14-05-2006, 09:31 PM

Steffo. If I remember correctly the RB25 has VCT were the RB20 did not. That is 1 very good reason to step up to a RB25......

Steffo · 14-05-2006, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jabba

Steffo. If I remember correctly the RB25 has VCT were the RB20 did not. That is 1 very good reason to step up to a RB25......

No, only the R34 had that, the RB25DET-Neo. The R33 didn't. And the 'Neo' engine is extremley unpopular due to difficulty and expense to work with. It is common practise to remove/disable it when chasing serious gains.

Yes... I used to be a Skyline nut.

Steffo · 14-05-2006, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkinshaw

if youre after "streetability" increasing the capacity is FAR better than any other mod.

Stepping up to an RB25 for a 13 sec R32 GTSt won't increase anything. Except the amount of money you spent.

XRQTOR · 14-05-2006, 10:26 PM

WHat sort of times does an R32 GT-R run stock, what times could be expected from one with full exhaust and a big cooler.