Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2006, 11:20 AM   #1
brendan24688
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 49
Default 201KW for VE?

http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/s...d.php?p=469183

The new Buick Enclave (concept) has a 201KW 3.6L. Could this be dropped in the VE also??

Power and efficiency

Enclave rides on a 119-inch wheelbase and is powered by a 3.6L high-feature V-6 with dual-overhead camshafts and variable valve timing. Enclave’s powerful V-6 offers one of the category’s most fuel-efficient options. The engine is rated at 270 horsepower (201 kw) and is backed by a six-speed automatic transmission. This luxury SUV also has all-wheel drive and four-wheel independent suspension.

brendan24688 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-01-2006, 11:29 AM   #2
Des
V8 Rock'n'Roll....
 
Des's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: You got me Rootin' like a Hog, Barkin' like a Dog, Climbing trees and Jumping logs....
Posts: 1,048
Default

With the extra weight it'll need more Nm not Kw's, especially lower down.
__________________
1 owner 03 BA XR8 Manual Sedan

208.8 rwkw stock, update soon

20x8.5 fr 20x10 rr
Rumble thanks to:
Sureflo Exhaust - Stainless Cat's & 3.5in single catback system


"Tell 'em the guy with the Blue Mohawk sent Ya"
Des is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-01-2006, 11:57 AM   #3
parawolf
beep beep
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,971
Default

Yes but at what revs does it generate that power? What Nm is it making across the range? Remember, an RX-8 produces ~177kw at ~8200rpm, but only about 211Nm at 5500rpm. Compare to another car in the segment is a 350Z, 206kW and 363Nm.

The 350Z has a worse kg/kw ratio than the RX-8, however its 0-100 and 400m times beat the RX-8. Why? its kg/Nm craps on the RX-8 (4.00kg/Nm vs 6.42kg/Nm).

More kW doesn't equal more performance.
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along, move along...
parawolf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-01-2006, 06:52 PM   #4
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parawolf
More kW doesn't equal more performance.
It equals sales though
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-01-2006, 06:55 PM   #5
parawolf
beep beep
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walkinshaw
It equals sales though
Righto... so with the Falcon having more kW and more Nm than the Holden Commodore, which sold more again month on month?
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along, move along...
parawolf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-01-2006, 09:52 PM   #6
phat_stak_tipa
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phat_stak_tipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,085
Default

Yeah that would be like holden 2 shove a crap yank motor into a commodore e.g the GEN 3 oil muncher hahahahahahaha
phat_stak_tipa is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-01-2006, 10:09 PM   #7
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

umm the 5.4 is a Yankee motor - available in the US from 1997, available in OZ 5 yrs later
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-01-2006, 10:12 PM   #8
parawolf
beep beep
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,971
Default

chevypower, don't bait the trolls. We don't really care a great deal what someone with 4 posts has to say when they come out with comments like that...
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along, move along...
parawolf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 12:58 AM   #9
phat_stak_tipa
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phat_stak_tipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,085
Default

i think the name of this site is FORD FORUMS there is no space for Holden ooops i mean chev if u visit a FORD forum expect a bagging blue blood sounds like you got chev blood sorry mate been spending money on cars not the net otherwise would have been here earlier telling it how it is CHEERS
phat_stak_tipa is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 01:12 AM   #10
rodderz
.
 
rodderz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bundoora
Posts: 7,199
Default

Correct, this is a Fordforum, but other news is welcomed of other manufacturers too
rodderz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 01:18 AM   #11
phat_stak_tipa
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phat_stak_tipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,085
Default

yeah just mucking around as a die hard ford supporter for all my life ive copped crap for years for liking fords just givn a little back. its funny some of the ford guys arked up pretty quick (parawolf) all i said was the truth but it obviously hurt which that tends to do have a good 1 rodderz
phat_stak_tipa is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 01:49 PM   #12
pauljh74
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
pauljh74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,602
Default

I have doubts the VE will get the upgraded motor because they just spent a little money making it Euro 3 compliant and if they were going to introduce an upgrade in the VE in such a short time. It probably would have been more economical to just upgrade it now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Webber
Not bad for a #2 driver
Mark Webber after winning the 2010 British Grand Prix.
pauljh74 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 01:55 PM   #13
parawolf
beep beep
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phat_stak_tipa
yeah just mucking around as a die hard ford supporter for all my life ive copped crap for years for liking fords just givn a little back. its funny some of the ford guys arked up pretty quick (parawolf) all i said was the truth but it obviously hurt which that tends to do have a good 1 rodderz
No it didn't "HURT" and all you were doing was flogging a dead horse which was covered years ago. Your comment lacked intelligence, lacked a basis, and lacked relevance.
__________________
Nothing to see here, move along, move along...
parawolf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 01:55 PM   #14
Falcon Freak
Banned
 
Falcon Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phat_stak_tipa
yeah just mucking around as a die hard ford supporter for all my life ive copped crap for years for liking fords just givn a little back. its funny some of the ford guys arked up pretty quick (parawolf) all i said was the truth but it obviously hurt which that tends to do have a good 1 rodderz
Keep dishing it out son - you have our support.

FF
Falcon Freak is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 03:32 PM   #15
Ryan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 3,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phat_stak_tipa
i think the name of this site is FORD FORUMS there is no space for Holden ooops i mean chev if u visit a FORD forum expect a bagging blue blood sounds like you got chev blood sorry mate been spending money on cars not the net otherwise would have been here earlier telling it how it is CHEERS
Yet aint it funny how alot of the discussion that goes on here is about Holdens?

E.g this thread _

Like someone said yes this is a Ford forum but other manufacturars are welcome.

Holden is not Chev, yes they use their engines but they are not Chev.

Just tellling it how it is.
Ryan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 03:57 PM   #16
Deadman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Deadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,490
Default

By the time Ford bring out the new 'Orion' model, I doubt any Falcon in their line up (bar the LPG version) will have less than 200kW. I'd be more impressed though if along with that, no model (bar the LPG version) had less than 400Nm. Both are pretty probable IMO.

Anyhow - back on track. With the expected weight the new Holden models are going to gain - Nm should definately be more of a focus than kW. I doubt the engine will change in the VE - but isn't most of the new weight in the VE coming from the new V8? I still don't think the VE V6 will be as heavy as the BF I6... V8's are another story though...

Quote:
Originally Posted by VY18s
Like someone said yes this is a Ford forum but other manufacturars are welcome.
Depends what you mean by "welcome" : kidding... ;)
Deadman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 04:59 PM   #17
phat_stak_tipa
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phat_stak_tipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,085
Default

hahahahaha ark up boys just proves my point not to worry lets get on with life.
phat_stak_tipa is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 06:29 PM   #18
YOOT
Banned
 
YOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Japan
Posts: 730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deadman
By the time Ford bring out the new 'Orion' model, I doubt any Falcon in their line up (bar the LPG version) will have less than 200kW. I'd be more impressed though if along with that, no model (bar the LPG version) had less than 400Nm. Both are pretty probable IMO.

Anyhow - back on track. With the expected weight the new Holden models are going to gain - Nm should definately be more of a focus than kW. I doubt the engine will change in the VE - but isn't most of the new weight in the VE coming from the new V8? I still don't think the VE V6 will be as heavy as the BF I6... V8's are another story though...



Depends what you mean by "welcome" : kidding... ;)

I don't know all the details but I do know form Motor that the smallest wheel size on the VE will be 17" even on the pov pack executives because PBR are fitting 300mm rotors as the standard brakes which are designed to cope with the VE's extra bulk. Expect the VE (all models) to be much heavier and closer to BA (possibly even exceed).
YOOT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 07:32 PM   #19
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

The Alloytec VE's will be absolute slugs if they put on all that extra weight, they don't have much in the way of torque to start with, and if Holden put tall ratios in them to boost economy like they have stated they will they will be smashed by any Ford 6.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 07:44 PM   #20
gmhdriver
Banned
 
gmhdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
The Alloytec VE's will be absolute slugs if they put on all that extra weight, they don't have much in the way of torque to start with, and if Holden put tall ratios in them to boost economy like they have stated they will they will be smashed by any Ford 6.
I don't think they lack torque as much as it is made out to be, I mean 320/340Nm aren't exactly low figures, but rather as you mentioned it is the the tall ratios which give the impression of a lack of low down torque. The VZ's are fitted with 2.75 final drive ratios... I would like to see what an alloytec would go like with 3.45's.
gmhdriver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 07:51 PM   #21
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Most of the power is up top, so they need to be reved to get going. Thats why they are considered to lack low down torque. The 2.75 diff ratio isn't the problem as it would have a low 1st gear in the gearbox to compansate, just like the ZF in the BF has a 2.78 diff ratio but a really low first gear.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 07:53 PM   #22
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brendan24688
http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/s...d.php?p=469183

The new Buick Enclave (concept) has a 201KW 3.6L. Could this be dropped in the VE also??
There was talk that the alloytec(wasn't calling it that at the time) was going to have 200kw. I doubt that holden would change the motor so quickly after just releasing this one. The Ecotec was in four models (about 10 years) and I believe that the power wasn't raised (152kw) since it was sold. Also I agree that they could make the motor 200kw but if it dosn't have torque to back it up than the engine would be useless on such a heavy car.
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 07:58 PM   #23
gmhdriver
Banned
 
gmhdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
There was talk that the alloytec(wasn't calling it that at the time) was going to have 200kw. I doubt that holden would change the motor so quickly after just releasing this one. The Ecotec was in four models (about 10 years) and I believe that the power wasn't raised (152kw) since it was sold. Also I agree that they could make the motor 200kw but if it dosn't have torque to back it up than the engine would be useless on such a heavy car.
The Ecotec was originally 147kW and 304Nm and was raised to 152Kw and 305Nm with the introduction of the VX. Not much of an increase I know, but an increase nonetheless.
gmhdriver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 08:08 PM   #24
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmhdriver
The Ecotec was originally 147kW and 304Nm and was raised to 152Kw and 305Nm with the introduction of the VX. Not much of an increase I know, but an increase nonetheless.

I stand corrected.

The higher end models have 190kw so the raise to 201 couldn't be that hard, but is the alloytec Euro3 compliant or have they had to do that for the VE model?
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 08:20 PM   #25
FPV8U
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
 
FPV8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,928
Default

Alloytec has no Torque so VE V6's will be slow whether it has 200Kw or not, having a base model neer 1900Kg isn't going to be good for economy especially when the auto will have to hunt gears as the engine has no "grunt".
FPV8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 09:19 PM   #26
gmhdriver
Banned
 
gmhdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPV8U
Alloytec has no Torque
It is not that the Alloytec 'has no torque', but rather where in the rev range it is produced and what sort of ratios are utilised. The Ecotec had significantly less torque (305Nm) yet it was always praised for having very good low down torque.
gmhdriver is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-01-2006, 10:44 PM   #27
xdclevo
The Fun Mobile
 
xdclevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns
Posts: 5,219
Default

Peak and averages are very different things. Peaks are for freaks. haha
__________________
408 cube Cleveland
TFC @ AFD 2V, 750 DP
10.7 @ 125 mph
2V powahhhhh
xdclevo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL