Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-04-2012, 09:13 PM   #61
Werd.
nou
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 634
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford_The_Win
I thought this was pretty respectable for a 15 year old car. A/C and cruise control set to 111 km/hr down the Hume Fwy.

image
The kombi gets 10L/100KM, highway, around town, thrashing it (slower than driving a camry sedately still :P), babying it, whatever. Solid 10 all the time.
Not bad for a 43 year old car
Werd. is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-04-2012, 09:20 PM   #62
G6ET8U
GTX Turbo & KB Blown
 
G6ET8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Whistling, GTX.
Posts: 2,937
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: ALWAYS goes out of his way to help others in need, never posts rubbish only facts he has learnt the hard way or with success in his personal experiance. Takes the time to aid more junior members and overall is a solid contributor to AFF. 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Just got back today from a trip to the VIC/NSW border and back for Easter with driving around in between.

Total would've been near 600kms total.

Average with 394rwkw (637hp) in my FG was 9.9L per 100kms.

They can be really economical clearly not in the 7's or 8's but I'd hate to think what a 600hp 'old' car would do on the same trip

Jack
__________________
DARTH 2008 FG G6ET
465.6rwkw
not a 10 @ 134.81 MPH

SNOW WHITE 2004 BA FPV PURSUIT
2.6L Kenne Bell
Brembos all round
Twin Screw Awesomeness


Supported, serviced and tuned by
BLUEPOWER RACING DEVELOPMENTS

http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11354744
G6ET8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-04-2012, 09:23 PM   #63
Werd.
nou
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 634
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by G6ET8U
Just got back today from a trip to the VIC/NSW border and back for Easter with driving around in between.

Total would've been near 600kms total.

Average with 394rwkw (637hp) in my FG was 9.9L per 100kms.

They can be really economical clearly not in the 7's or 8's but I'd hate to think what a 600hp 'old' car would do on the same trip

Jack
Incredible that you have well over 10X more power than I do.. about 15X more in fact. How do you keep your license?
Werd. is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-04-2012, 09:29 PM   #64
G6ET8U
GTX Turbo & KB Blown
 
G6ET8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Whistling, GTX.
Posts: 2,937
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: ALWAYS goes out of his way to help others in need, never posts rubbish only facts he has learnt the hard way or with success in his personal experiance. Takes the time to aid more junior members and overall is a solid contributor to AFF. 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Werd.
Incredible that you have well over 10X more power than I do.. about 15X more in fact. How do you keep your license?
Easy pick your moments etc but either way it's suprising just how streetable the power is.

And economical too!

Jack
__________________
DARTH 2008 FG G6ET
465.6rwkw
not a 10 @ 134.81 MPH

SNOW WHITE 2004 BA FPV PURSUIT
2.6L Kenne Bell
Brembos all round
Twin Screw Awesomeness


Supported, serviced and tuned by
BLUEPOWER RACING DEVELOPMENTS

http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11354744
G6ET8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 09-04-2012, 10:15 PM   #65
Polyal
Virtuous Bogan (TM)
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,528
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Good thread!

I did a road trip from Melbourne to Canberra, the trip there and back I filled up twice. I cant believe I paid 98 cents for LPG in the ACT but what can ya do.

So to go from the ACT to VIC, with the AU loaded and 4 people I spent $63 one way.

All up I spent something like $150 for the 4 days we where away, ~1500kms.

The Hume is so easy its ridiculous...just wish it had a higher limit!
__________________
  • 2023 Mitsubishi Triton
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 09-04-2012, 10:21 PM   #66
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,832
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My EL Fairmont Ghia was showing between 7-9L/100km on the instant readout when I was driving it home when I first bought it. I haven't calculated it manually yet as its only been driven once to my house and that was it.

Though, I have used about 45L idling it in my driveway, lol.
Franco Cozzo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 05:48 AM   #67
Ben73
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ben73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,322
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo
My EL Fairmont Ghia was showing between 7-9L/100km on the instant readout when I was driving it home when I first bought it. I haven't calculated it manually yet as its only been driven once to my house and that was it.

Though, I have used about 45L idling it in my driveway, lol.
Instant consumptions are always entertaining. I got a 4 cylinder diesel prado to show 99.9L/100kms on the instant display. I'm sure it stopped there because it couldn't go into triple figures.
4 people, each with a heavy bag, very steep hill, 90kmh+, WOT made it shoot up into the 90s very quickly. Don't know how accurate it is. That same car shows an average of 8.5L

Ah the things you do while bored on a country highway.
Ben73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 07:07 AM   #68
casabonka
You can call me Chris
 
casabonka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 712
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Last year we did cambelltown to Melbourne on one tank in a fg ute. That ended up being about 850 odd Kms.
__________________
'06 LS Focus Hatch
-2 1/4" Lukey Exhaust
-RDA Slotted discs/Greenstuff pads
-Rear Whiteline swaybay
-Lenso 18's w/Kumho rubber
-Tinted Windows
casabonka is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 10:26 AM   #69
84dau
Regular Member
 
84dau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 57
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My old stock manual BA xr6T made it from Rocky to southside of brisbane on a full tank, was impressed
84dau is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 10:52 AM   #70
Lightning Strike GT
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Lightning Strike GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: QLD
Posts: 1,255
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My old BF XR8 sed 6 man was pretty good on the motion lotion
Filled up at BP North Lakes and got all the way to Raymond Tce on 1 tank mind you it was winter and all night driving and the Cruise Control was always on all the way down the Pac Hwy - that droped it down to under 8l 100kms
The FG GT I have has great economy driving it like Miss Daisy around town it is in the high 11 to low 12 and a run on the freeway it drops to about 9 - freak of a car even doing the FPV drive day and flogging the ring gear out of it it only went to 14
__________________
Regards Alan
FG GT in Lightning Strike
5th anniversary edition in manual 1 of 25
And an 2019 MD Mondeo Trend Wagon in Platinum White
Lightning Strike GT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 11:08 AM   #71
kaniSS
BIG MEMBER ;)
 
kaniSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 940
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

The best part is pulling away with ease from the Mazda owners struggling to get up a hill on the highway with a packed car...
__________________
2010 FG XR6T, EGO, MANUAL, LUXURY PACK.
kaniSS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 11:27 AM   #72
Polyal
Virtuous Bogan (TM)
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,528
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaniSS
The best part is pulling away with ease from the Mazda owners struggling to get up a hill on the highway with a packed car...
Mazda.....I do that with my crummy old Intech AU to Alloytech's..LOL ..on GAS!
__________________
  • 2023 Mitsubishi Triton
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 11:43 AM   #73
mac_man_luke
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mac_man_luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Australia
Posts: 2,149
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Did 500kms on friday towing in my XR8 ute and averaged 13L/100km

Now urban driving is another story 18L/100km++
__________________
2015 Toyota Landcruiser 79 V8 SC
mac_man_luke is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 11:46 AM   #74
Smoke Pursuit
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22,881
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: DASH/bfiipursuit has been alot of help over the years I have frequented this forum, lots of thoughtful and informed posts, very much a valued contributor. 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My modded 5.4 FG GT will do 8.5 litres per hundred on a long flat trip... Not bad for a car putting out over 300kw!!

Around town the worse it gets is about 14.5.
__________________
2022 RAM Laramie 5.7
2023.50 Ranger Wildtrak 3.0 V6 Premium Pack
2024 Everest Sport 3.0 V6 Touring Pack
2024.50 Mustang GT 10A Grabber Blue Nite Pony Package. Due Aug 24.
Smoke Pursuit is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 01:20 PM   #75
Silver Ghia
Moderator
Donating Member3
 
Silver Ghia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Foothills of the Macedon Ranges
Posts: 18,502
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: As Silver Ghia his contributions to the AU and BA technical areas have been of high quality and valuable to the member base. 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I've kept an Excel spreadsheet of the overall fuel consumption of my FG XR50 manual since delivery in Oct 2010, 31261 kms travelled to the last fill. Usage including peak hour traffic to the city (Melbourne) 5 days per week, not just a trip in the country.

Overall average = 9.46 lt/100km.

Silver Ghia is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 10-04-2012, 06:42 PM   #76
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

i reckon that`s pretty decent economy Silver Ghia, considering how suky is the Melb traffic.
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-04-2012, 06:44 PM   #77
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,832
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben73
Instant consumptions are always entertaining. I got a 4 cylinder diesel prado to show 99.9L/100kms on the instant display. I'm sure it stopped there because it couldn't go into triple figures.
4 people, each with a heavy bag, very steep hill, 90kmh+, WOT made it shoot up into the 90s very quickly. Don't know how accurate it is. That same car shows an average of 8.5L

Ah the things you do while bored on a country highway.
Yeah its showing 99L/100km at the moment because it hasn't moved anywhere haha.
Franco Cozzo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-04-2012, 09:11 AM   #78
302 XC
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,527
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Some good economy figure none the less
But whats mosts average over the year ???
I mean i can coast in angel gear to get good economy if i wanted figures to look good
But i prefer to realistically put the boot in when i have to
We have as a runabout a hyundie 4potter,auto (it was free)it uses on average as much as a 4L falcon or territory
So the myth that 4 potters are cheap compared to 6s is just that a myth
I know what id rather drive and it aint the hyundie
302 XC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 31-01-2014, 11:11 PM   #79
lm8503
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 6
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I'm getting 9.6l/100km overall, combined highway/city driving in an FG R6 6spd manual-which means I can get from home (north of Adelaide) to Melbourne on a tank without the orange light showing.
lm8503 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 01-02-2014, 07:12 AM   #80
Bill M
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Bill M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,212
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver Ghia View Post
I've kept an Excel spreadsheet of the overall fuel consumption of my FG XR50 manual since delivery in Oct 2010, 31261 kms travelled to the last fill. Usage including peak hour traffic to the city (Melbourne) 5 days per week, not just a trip in the country.

Overall average = 9.46 lt/100km.

image
Cool data.
In used to own a mid sized 2.4 Nissan Bluebird 1993-97 that achieved similar consumption. Your data show just how much large rear drive aussie cars have improved, a fact that seems lost on many critics.
Your data is one of many I know of to validate this.
__________________
AUII XR6 VCT ute
20 years and still going strong!
Bill M is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 01-02-2014, 09:35 AM   #81
ebzery
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: country nsw
Posts: 191
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Best I got was Sydney to home 800km on a tank in my zj fairlane 4.9 v8 normally around 400km that's for a 80l tank.
My xr8 au2 used to get around 800km when I had the twin system exhaust now around 640km with single 3in system.
Around town about 350 for 60l of fuel that's at 50km per hour tops stop starts and only 4 km trips.
ebzery is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-02-2014, 10:35 AM   #82
red_hotxr6
Banned
 
red_hotxr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brisbane
Posts: 2,039
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My el ghia gives me 9.2 per 100 between brisbane and laidley, 275,000 klms..in the morning and afternoon traffic its about 16, but that is stop start and waiting..
red_hotxr6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-02-2014, 10:51 AM   #83
mechanic
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Cairns FNQ
Posts: 602
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Just brought my 2007 BF MK11 auto from SEQ to Cairns via some hilly country and gravel roads but mainly highway.
Averaged about 9.5L/100Klm.
mechanic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-02-2014, 10:52 AM   #84
mechanic
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Cairns FNQ
Posts: 602
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Actually forgot to add it's an RTV ute and the distance travelled was just under 2,000 Ks
mechanic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-02-2014, 11:46 AM   #85
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,832
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo View Post
My EL Fairmont Ghia was showing between 7-9L/100km on the instant readout when I was driving it home when I first bought it. I haven't calculated it manually yet as its only been driven once to my house and that was it.

Though, I have used about 45L idling it in my driveway, lol.
I should update this saying that I can't get it under 11.5L/100km all highway, though its got low comp and lower comp on cylinder 1.

I'm getting about 600km on 70L of United 100 or BP 98, car has been tuned.
Franco Cozzo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-02-2014, 12:48 PM   #86
Cuyper
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 207
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

That's all great and everything getting 7-9 l per 100 in large petrol cars but to be fair both Commodores and Falcon have been able to do that since at least the early 90s.

You need to be running 3-5l per 100 in small cars and 6 in a large car to sell them now.
Cuyper is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-02-2014, 01:25 PM   #87
AC
Saving for a Jet Car
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: richmond.nsw.au
Posts: 3,745
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Since having my Mirage, I've been talking to a lot of Lancer guys, even the newer Lancers are getting high 9's to 10's L/100kms. I reckon anyone with the much bigger and roomier Falcon that's getting similar economy should be laughing, I know what I'd rather

@Cuyper, 3-5L is hybrid territory, so non hybrid, you'd have to be pussy footing like your driving Miss Daisy do that that milage, one of my mates has a Camry hybrid his lowest is 4.1, but averages 5.1, Prius would be a little better being a smaller car.

Even my little Mirage was averaging 7.2 when I was a stock 68kw1.5L, now that it's a 1.8 with 3X the power, it's only crept up to 7.7L/100, which I'm pretty happy with.
__________________
RIDES
2011 SZ Territory Titanium TDCi - Smoke
2001 Mitsubishi "BONSAI" GSR Mirage - see thread
AC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 01-02-2014, 11:27 PM   #88
In Focus
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: W.A.
Posts: 1,711
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I'm averaging 7.4 in the Skoda on about 50/50 urban/free- or highway driving.
__________________
His: 2019 Ford Focus SA Trend with Driver Assist Pack: 1.5 Ecoboost 3-cylinder (yes, 3 cylinders!), 8-speed automatic in Ruby Red.

Hers: 2020 Ford Puma JK: 1.0 Ecoboost 3-cylinder, 7-speed DCT in Frozen White.
In Focus is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-02-2014, 11:48 PM   #89
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,832
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
Since having my Mirage, I've been talking to a lot of Lancer guys, even the newer Lancers are getting high 9's to 10's L/100kms. I reckon anyone with the much bigger and roomier Falcon that's getting similar economy should be laughing, I know what I'd rather

@Cuyper, 3-5L is hybrid territory, so non hybrid, you'd have to be pussy footing like your driving Miss Daisy do that that milage, one of my mates has a Camry hybrid his lowest is 4.1, but averages 5.1, Prius would be a little better being a smaller car.

Even my little Mirage was averaging 7.2 when I was a stock 68kw1.5L, now that it's a 1.8 with 3X the power, it's only crept up to 7.7L/100, which I'm pretty happy with.
I'm getting 5.5L/100km driving around my Diesel Focus on all highway, goes up to 6L/100km if I boot it everywhere.
Franco Cozzo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 01-02-2014, 11:54 PM   #90
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 8,880
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuyper View Post
That's all great and everything getting 7-9 l per 100 in large petrol cars but to be fair both Commodores and Falcon have been able to do that since at least the early 90s.

You need to be running 3-5l per 100 in small cars and 6 in a large car to sell them now.
I30 quotes 5.4 for highway, best I could get was 6.4
FG XR6 quotes 8.3, I got 7.9 without trying.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL