Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-06-2010, 03:01 PM   #31
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie muscle
actually, BF finished in 2007?
BF finished 06, BFII finished in 08.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 03:03 PM   #32
Brazen
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Brazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote V8
hard to think its being 10 years since AU-BF models. far out...

Yep, same wagon body being sold from 1998, 12 years ago! And it still outsells the Mondeo.
Brazen is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 03:23 PM   #33
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 8,870
Default

Chevy Suburban has been around since the 1930s, not continuous but the name is still in use. Technically the Corvette isnt continuous either as there was no 1982 model.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 08:30 PM   #34
dannyhilton
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
dannyhilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,801
Default

Ford Australia have been very quite on this kind of thing for so long, so hearing this makes me think that they have received some great new from head office. Fingers crossed we can put the Falcon and Mustang back on the same platform, preferably based on the Falcon, and then we'll have a proper, world class GRWD platform.
__________________
CURRENT: 2017 Escape Titanium 2.0L EcoBoost with Technology Pack in White Platinum
PREVIOUS 2015 Fiesta ST / 2012 Focus Titanium / 2009 Fiesta Zetec / 2004 Fiesta Zetec
dannyhilton is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 08:37 PM   #35
Resurrection
I was correct - AGAIN
 
Resurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
Default

What will determine the life of the FG is when Euro V is introduced in Australia. Ford will not want to spend money calibrating a model which is nearing the end of its life.
Resurrection is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 09:01 PM   #36
JPFS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JPFS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection
What will determine the life of the FG is when Euro V is introduced in Australia. Ford will not want to spend money calibrating a model which is nearing the end of its life.
Euro3 and 4 is where the big dollars had to be spent on engine development from an emissions point of view.

5 & 6 is all in the tune and cats now.. (and better fuel quality), and IL6 can do it.
JPFS1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 09:12 PM   #37
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPFS1
Euro3 and 4 is where the big dollars had to be spent on engine development from an emissions point of view.

5 & 6 is all in the tune and cats now.. (and better fuel quality), and IL6 can do it.
Isn't the biggest issue getting it to last longer and comply??

Also the better fuel quality will be interesting cause the price of fuel for the masses which will increase pressure on larger cars being more fuel efficient.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 09:21 PM   #38
Paxton
Cobblers!
 
Paxton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Shire, NSW
Posts: 4,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
Isn't the biggest issue getting it to last longer and comply??

Also the better fuel quality will be interesting cause the price of fuel for the masses which will increase pressure on larger cars being more fuel efficient.
All the work to achieve Euro V is done, so they have until it is introduced to get the hardware to work. The I6 has a place in the next Falcon if what I've heard is true.
__________________
Ego BFII Ghia
Titanium Silver E53 X5 4.4i
Gunmetal EF XR6. Now retired from active duty.
Roses are red. Violets are blue. OS X rocks. Homage to you.
Paxton is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 09:43 PM   #39
Joe5619
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paxton
All the work to achieve Euro V is done, so they have until it is introduced to get the hardware to work. The I6 has a place in the next Falcon if what I've heard is true.
Silly question, if the work is done, why don't we see it on the car then?? Sounds silly to do the work & then not put it in the car!
Joe5619 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 09:56 PM   #40
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,208
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe5619
Silly question, if the work is done, why don't we see it on the car then?? Sounds silly to do the work & then not put it in the car!
Money, Euro 4 cost $21 million and the Government pitched in $13 million of that.
When the government wants Ford to develop and validate compliant
I-6 enginefor Euro 5 and 6, Ford can ask for funding to make that happen.
That way Ford can play the local engine and castings plants for all its worth.
jpd80 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 09:58 PM   #41
Paxton
Cobblers!
 
Paxton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Shire, NSW
Posts: 4,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
Money, Euro 4 cost $21 million and the Government pitched in $13 million of that.
When the government wants Ford to develop and validate compliant
I-6 enginefor Euro 5 and 6, Ford can ask for funding to make that happen.
That way Ford can play the local engine and castings plants for all its worth.
Sounds about right mate.
__________________
Ego BFII Ghia
Titanium Silver E53 X5 4.4i
Gunmetal EF XR6. Now retired from active duty.
Roses are red. Violets are blue. OS X rocks. Homage to you.
Paxton is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 10:10 PM   #42
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,208
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paxton
Sounds about right mate.
I'm thinking Aussie Emissions will stay in step with Asian countries,
China, India and Australia move onto Euro 4 this year so maybe
we sit with them and go to Euro 5 when Europe goes to Euro 6....
jpd80 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 10:29 PM   #43
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paxton
All the work to achieve Euro V is done, so they have until it is introduced to get the hardware to work. The I6 has a place in the next Falcon if what I've heard is true.
In fact, "they made it look easy"
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-06-2010, 10:54 PM   #44
Paxton
Cobblers!
 
Paxton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Shire, NSW
Posts: 4,489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falc'man
In fact, "they made it look easy"
They did indeed. Who needs Alloy Blocks and Direct Injection. This engine can't be killed. Many have tried, none have succeeded.
__________________
Ego BFII Ghia
Titanium Silver E53 X5 4.4i
Gunmetal EF XR6. Now retired from active duty.
Roses are red. Violets are blue. OS X rocks. Homage to you.
Paxton is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 12:39 AM   #45
JPFS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JPFS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
Isn't the biggest issue getting it to last longer and comply??

Also the better fuel quality will be interesting cause the price of fuel for the masses which will increase pressure on larger cars being more fuel efficient.
Yes that's definitely another difference between the standards, but I wouldn't say it's the biggest issue.

PLENTY of good news on the horizon.......and not only relating to this.... i think ;)
JPFS1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 12:58 AM   #46
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPFS1
Yes that's definitely another difference between the standards, but I wouldn't say it's the biggest issue.

PLENTY of good news on the horizon.......and not only relating to this.... i think ;)
Ahh ok. I knew they smoked E5 in. But didn't know how much the costs for getting it into production was gonna be an issue.

With Marin steadying the ship the other day, things are looking good. I'd hate to see a good car go. Especially one that has so much potential.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 03:36 AM   #47
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6 Martin
Chevy Suburban has been around since the 1930s, not continuous but the name is still in use. Technically the Corvette isnt continuous either as there was no 1982 model.
Falcon is 2nd longest running FORD nameplate, not overall. Its topped by the F series.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 07:46 AM   #48
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,208
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPFS1
Yes that's definitely another difference between the standards, but I wouldn't say it's the biggest issue.

PLENTY of good news on the horizon.......and not only relating to this.... i think ;)
With FoA confident that the I-6 can meet Euro 5 & 6, their attention will no doubt turns to
where the Falcon goes to from here and what vehicles need to be allowed for under its umbrella.
jpd80 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 09:46 AM   #49
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paxton
They did indeed. Who needs Alloy Blocks and Direct Injection. This engine can't be killed. Many have tried, none have succeeded.

Isn't it great?
Almost brings a tear to the eye that something which is the absolute undisputed class leader is designed and built here.
The funny bit is watching the other manufacturers crate in engines from their global parts bins and not be able to match the little aussie battler.

No joke, Ford Oz has the best, most reliable and long lived 6 cylinder engine in the world. Over 400nm of torque from a naturally aspirated 6 cylinder; unbelievable.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 10:32 AM   #50
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ltd
Isn't it great?
Almost brings a tear to the eye that something which is the absolute undisputed class leader is designed and built here.
The funny bit is watching the other manufacturers crate in engines from their global parts bins and not be able to match the little aussie battler.

No joke, Ford Oz has the best, most reliable and long lived 6 cylinder engine in the world. Over 400nm of torque from a naturally aspirated 6 cylinder; unbelievable.
Made on a shoestring budget
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 11:21 AM   #51
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paxton
All the work to achieve Euro V is done, so they have until it is introduced to get the hardware to work. The I6 has a place in the next Falcon if what I've heard is true.
The only thing there is that the platform architecture will still need to accommodate an 'orphan' engine from 2016 instead of a global engine, which dents the platform-sharing concept. Unless the designers can work out common hardpoints that will accommodate both the I6 and global motors...then again the Coyote is a global engine so much of that work may have already been done...
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 11:44 AM   #52
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,208
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
The only thing there is that the platform architecture will still need to accommodate an 'orphan' engine from 2016 instead of a global engine, which dents the platform-sharing concept. Unless the designers can work out common hardpoints that will accommodate both the I6 and global motors...then again the Coyote is a global engine so much of that work may have already been done...
Skip the Mustang, let's do a Falcon coupe on a slightly shorter wheelbase
and call it THUNDERBIRD..Americans would go crazy for that..

We could also build Lincolns on the Thunderbird, Falcon and Fairlane
FoA could head up the luxury car market for Lincoln with Global sales
that include I-4 and V6 Ecoboost, V6 and V8 Diesel and Petrol V8 variants.
jpd80 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 12:36 PM   #53
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

I think the I6 days are still numbered....
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 12:45 PM   #54
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,208
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
I think the I6 days are still numbered....
Depends on your time line, Burela has just confirmed that the
current E8 product cycle is continuing for another five years.
jpd80 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 01:04 PM   #55
Dr Smith
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melb.
Posts: 4,413
Default

Which raises a question in my mind that as a non-engineer I don't know the answer. For a while now about the only negative (in the press that is) that has been aimed at the I6 is it still retains the same bore centre spacings as the early derivatives from many decades ago. What I would like to know is how in hell is that a "negative" and how does this have any bearing on efficiency etc...?

It's a bit like saying the standard school ruler has remained 30cm long since 1966. What bearing does that have on the ability to draw a straight line or measure distance or in fact make it an inferior design?
Dr Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 01:21 PM   #56
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

Nothing negative about that at all - unless you're building an 8000rpm screamer.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 01:23 PM   #57
Raptor
^^^^^^^^
Donating Member2
 
Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: online - duh
Posts: 9,633
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For quietly going about moderating in a fair and even manner. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Smith
Which raises a question in my mind that as a non-engineer I don't know the answer. For a while now about the only negative (in the press that is) that has been aimed at the I6 is it still retains the same bore centre spacings as the early derivatives from many decades ago. What I would like to know is how in hell is that a "negative" and how does this have any bearing on efficiency etc...?

It's a bit like saying the standard school ruler has remained 30cm long since 1966. What bearing does that have on the ability to draw a straight line or measure distance or in fact make it an inferior design?
Bore spacing is largely irrelevent IMHO. The press are just trying to portray the engine as old technology and that's about the only thing they can reference that relates back to the original I6 engines. The rest is close to state-of-the-art, well except for the heavy iron block and long lazy stroke but that's why we love em.

However, as appealing as I find the I6, maintaining such a large N-S engine does create packaging compromises that are becoming harder to justify as each year passes. Such as the long bonnet (cabin space implications), engine weight distribution (forward and high c-of-g), higher bonnet line (pedestrian impact crush/crumple zones) and so on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
The only thing there is that the platform architecture will still need to accommodate an 'orphan' engine from 2016 instead of a global engine, which dents the platform-sharing concept. Unless the designers can work out common hardpoints that will accommodate both the I6 and global motors...then again the Coyote is a global engine so much of that work may have already been done...
The I6 just needs to stop being an orphan and go global (well US anyway). It's be a natural fit (along with the Territory diesel) in the on-again/off-again downsized and reborn F100. I'd love to hear the Aussie engineers had secretly been fitting and testing the I6 in the T6 Ranger replacement.

Ford US, not only do we have your premium Lincoln RWD sedan but here's your new F100 too
(Coyote, Barra I6 and small Diesel engine options)
__________________
.
'93 XG Falcon Ute( sold ) : '94 ED Falcon Classic ( sold ) : '04 Territory SX TS ( sold ) : '04 Falcon RTV BAII ute (still in the family)

Last edited by Raptor; 30-06-2010 at 01:35 PM.
Raptor is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 01:26 PM   #58
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
I think the I6 days are still numbered....
Nothing lasts forever, but I wouldn't want to start counting down just yet. Not even in 5 years time.
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 01:30 PM   #59
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falc'man
Nothing lasts forever, but I wouldn't want to start counting down just yet. Not even in 5 years time.
It would be getting close but. The main things the tell me that its last days are near, are its length, the fact that its iron blocked and Ford's global strategy.
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-06-2010, 01:37 PM   #60
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

I thought I read somewhere that the I6 is getting a look in for a more industrial application such as in pick up trucks. Wasn't there talk that another marquee was interested in the aussie I6?
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL