Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-08-2009, 08:39 PM   #16
ehast13
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 514
Default

Hang on. Only 0.6L (AS2877 ave) better per hundred k than a much torquier, quicker ford?

Even at a high 1.50 a litre, that is only 90cents more per hundred k.

At 20,000km per year that is only $180 more per year (or $3.60 per week).

Add Me (102kg) , the wife (51kg) , two kids (30kg combined) a double stroller (about a million kilos)and endless supplies of kids stuff and I reckon the 3.0 would have to work that much harder to keep up that the six speed falc would be more economical.

My old 351 xy (stocko 2v) ute used to tow our old bonwood caravan more economically than the wife's 250 2v xy fairmont. The smaller six had to be worked so much harder.

Maybe this isn't relevant but, i thought it might be of interest
ehast13 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL